juries essays

juries essays Beginning with the drafting and ratification of the United States Constitution, the sixth amendment right, right to trial by peers or jury, has been enforced. Throughout history, the jury process has been used in various cases, whether a high-profile case or a state or local criminal case, juries have been the fundamental factors in considering whether or not a defendant is to be freed or sent for punishment. As time has progressed, however, the jury process has complicated, and juries have become more and more susceptible to coercion and corruption in the courtrooms, thus causing glitches and oftentimes costly errors in the United States courts of law. From jury selection to juror lack of knowledge or even motivation, corruption and confusion has been present and has caused problems which can be avoidable and treated. Should the United States continue to exercise their right to trial by peers, or should they reconsider the proven mishaps and errors juries often make and eliminate the jury process altogether? As proven in the United States Constitution, a trial by jury is a given and required right to Americans encountering the law. As an amendment, Americans should then maintain that right as they do with other amendments, and should not necessarily be stripped from this right. As easily proven throughout various court cases, juries have proven to be successful in punishing the guilty and freeing the innocent, and have effectively exercised their right of trial by jury. In this regard, juries should thus be allowed to continue in courtrooms and made even more readily available for those who Although oftentimes proven accurate and successful, juries are faced with corruption and mistakes just as often. Cases where jurors have proven innocent and defendants have later plead guilty have occurred numerously, ...